Archive

Cab licensing, paving project dominate Orangeville council

September 16, 2015   ·   1 Comments

An alleged taxi-licence monopoly in Orangeville was the hot topic at Monday night’s town council meeting.

Narinder Paul Singh, a former local taxi driver, brought the issue to Council by asking that they re-visit the current bylaw, which restricts the number of licenses available. He is now a limo driver, with his own limo that he wishes to operate locally, but due to the By-Law, which affects both taxi and limo licenses, he is unable to obtain a license.

Currently, the town has 28 active licenses; 18 issued to Call A Cab, nine to Orangeville Taxi and just one to Dufferin Taxi. But complaints have arisen as to whether all these licensed cabs are actively on the road, amidst other issues.

Mayor Jeremy Williams warned prior to the discussion that identifying any specific business or person within the complaint
was not allowable due to legal issues, and that those specific matters would be discussed later during the closed meeting.

Issues of concern that were brought up during the discussion by parties who felt the bylaw is unfair included the number of licences to specific companies and lack of availability of cabs for customers, the current rate structure approved by Orangeville Council and the sign bylaws for advertising.

The rate structure was also brought up by Mr. Singh, who pointed out that currently, Orangeville has one of the highest rates at $2.17 per km, versus $1.50/km in Shelburne, and under $2.00/km in most other surrounding towns and cities.

Throughout the discussion, a large number of local taxi drivers offered their services in answering any questions about the cab industry, suggesting that things are fine the way they are.

“This is not a new problem,” said Trevor Castiglione, owner of Busted Knuckle Garage. Mr. Castiglione helped start one of the local cab companies several years ago, and said they experienced many of the same issues even back then. “In my opinion the only way this will be solved, unless council wants to spend weeks listening, is to take a direct look at the bylaw and speak to direct people involved.”

Councillor Scott Wilson however felt that the complaints brought forward were not sufficient to indicate that there was a problem with the local cab industry, and that, having not received any complaints from residents, felt it wasn’t something they needed to look at.

“Chances are, there is nothing wrong,” said Mayor Williams in response. “But when I have many, many people contacting me saying that there is an issue, I’d be a fool not to look into it.”

Following the closed portion of the meeting, Council voted in favour of a motion to look into the bylaw. A committee will be created, consisting of five members of the public (including taxi drivers and owners), which will receive support from the Build- ing and By-law staff and police to review the Taxi By-Law 119-2004 to bring a report to Council. Included in this will be at least two open houses to gather public input. All members of Council were in favour of the motion, save for Councillor Wilson, who voted against it.

The By-Law department will also be fol- lowing up with specific complaints raised during the closed meeting.

A second hot issue arose during council after the receipt of correspondence from a number of residents of Newton Drive, who were present at Council to highlight their concerns that their street had not been scheduled to be redone this year.

The issue was that Highland Drive, which forms a crescent intersected by Newton, is in the process of being repaved, while their street, which has also not been repaved for over 40 years, is not scheduled for similar work. They argued that not only would it be more cost-efficient to the Town to do it at the same time, it also would have made more sense, especially since the street’s condition is worsening with the large trucks and other equipment driving down it to Highland.

After a lengthy discussion regarding the viability of adding Newton to the list of projects this year, Council decided to move forward with the project, which will cost an additional $100,000. The money will be taken from any surplus left by any departments this year, and if they cannot garner the total from that, will be taken from reserves.

All but Councillor Gail Campbell voted in favour of the project, as Councillor Campbell did not want to see reserves touched out of fear that Council would end up fac- ing a similar situation as last year at budget time.

“I am extremely sympathetic to the residents of Newton, but I’m not going to support this,” she said. “We went through agony during the budget process, and we fought hard to get what we have. We need to follow that list from Public Works, unless we are prepared to raise taxes more to do the roads.”

The motion as approved states that regardless of how the funds are taken, they will be viewed as a line-item that must be passed in the 2016 budget, ensuring that if reserves are touched, the money will go back in immediately.

In the meantime, repaving of Newton Drive is to be completed before the end of this year.


Readers Comments (1)

  1. Mike says:

    I have been using call a cab services for years and have never had issues with their service. Their drivers are very friendly and honest. Once I forgot my wallet with $200 cash in their cab and was returned to me before i even noticed it missing. I think there are much more important issues to focus on in our town than wasting city council time on this.

     Reply




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.