Commentary

Campaign afoot to kick-start property assessments

October 1, 2026   ·   1 Comments

By JAMES MATTHEWS

Numbers. They’re all around us.

That’s according to an advertisement I recently watched from the province’s Municipal Property Assessment Corporation. That’s the crowd that assesses what properties throughout Ontario are worth. Your home’s monetary worth. Not its sentimental worth as the place where a family’s memories, good and bad, have been made.

Images in the ad show numbers on a mailbox. The digits that make up a street address. A keypad as part of an alarm system presumably for a house. There are numbers on a sports jersey for some reason. The point is they’re all around us, numbers.

Street address numbers don’t change. And some athletes have been known, for superstitious and other reasons, to wear the same jersey number even though the jersey’s colours and team logo change.

And that’s fitting, given that MPAC’s commercial and residential property assessments have been frozen for the last decade. Municipalities have been left to maintain and improve infrastructure and balance budgets according to numbers from assessments last done in 2016.

And in that time, the costs to live have increased, as have prices for much of the materials used to keep towns, townships, and cities in good repair.

Letters have been sent to Ontario municipal councils by a tax policy group called Ryan Canada ULC as part of a campaign to “unfreeze Ontario.” Unfreeze Ontario is a lobby effort to get the province to reinstate regular property assessments, beginning with a province-wide reassessment in 2027. That would be handy next year. The opening year of the new term of municipal and county councils.

Part of the campaign is that letters be sent by municipal councils to Premier Doug Ford and Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy calling on them to restore regular property assessments.

The letter has been sent to Mono’s elected officials and a number of Ontario municipal councils. Mono council decided to look further into the tax company before hitching their wagon to the effort. But the letter campaign generated discussion amongst that Dufferin County town’s councillors when they met Sept. 22.

In the decade since the last assessments, property values and economic conditions have changed significantly, yet those changes are not being reflected in the distribution of the property tax burden, Ryan Canada states in its letter.

“For municipalities, this is fundamentally an issue of fairness, predictability, and sound fiscal planning. Reassessment does not automatically mean higher property taxes. It simply ensures property values reflect today’s market so the tax burden can be shared more fairly.”

One of the trusses of Unfreeze Ontario is that this is fundamentally an issue of fairness, predictability, and sound fiscal planning, as reassessment ensures property values reflect today’s market so the tax burden can be shared more fairly.

The freeze also makes it harder for municipalities to plan for growth, infrastructure, housing, and development using a tax base that no longer reflects their communities’ reality.

MPAC had a presence at the 2026 Association of Municipalities of Ontario conference in August, as you’d expect. According to Ryan Canada, the need for reassessments of Ontario’s properties was a concern.

Municipal and county councils are not asking for reassessments to continue because they’re trying to collect more property tax at a time when money is for all kinds of reasons tight for taxpayers. Rather, reassessments could make it financially easier for some property owners to live when money is tight today.

From Ryan Canada’s website: “When assessments no longer reflect relative market values, some property owners can shoulder more than their fair share of the tax burden while others pay less. The longer assessments remain frozen, the greater those distortions may become.”

Numbers are all around us. And some of them are incorrect numbers.


Readers Comments (1)

  1. Joseph Ferndale says:

    Ryan Property Tax (Ryan Canada ULC) wants to unfreeze the assessments so it can appeal those same assessments. The company makes money from reductions in assessed values when municipalities refund taxes after a successful challenge of the MPAC assessed value. While it’s true that the reassessment can redistribute assessment values and ultimately taxes, the opposite is also true: municipalities have a stable tax base right now. Because there is no reassessment, there are fewer assessment appeals that lead to reductions in taxes. A home owner’s taxes may go up or down with a reassessment. If your assessed value goes up by more than the average, then your taxes will increase, and vice versa. Put simply, from the 2016 tax year to now, home values have peaked during the pandemic and gone back down. However, larger homes went up higher than the average and subsequently gone down lower than the average whereas smaller homes were less volatile. In most cases, larger homes (generally wealthier people) will have a lower percentage increase than the average and smaller homes (generally less wealthy people) will have a higher percent increase if a reassessment were to happen today. This means percentage wise, smaller homes will see a greater tax increase.

    If all the assessments increased, the tax rates from the municipalities will generally go down. The ultimate goal is for the municipality to get the money it needs to operate. Taxes generally go up though because municipalities need more to pay staff cost of living wage increases, pay emergency services more, etc. and with less people going to work, municipal revenue generators like parking enforcement is not increasing as it once was, there are no more speed cameras which where cash cows, etc.

    Any taxation company like Ryan Canada ULC that is lobbying for unfreezing the assessments is solely self-interested in making the municipal tax base less stable, not more stable. These companies are the single largest risk to financial stability to any municipality. Don’t be fooled. They appeal assessments that can take years in court and if they are successful, tax reductions can go back 2-3 years, if not more! That means municipalities have to set aside a percentage of tax dollars to have in the coffers in cases a large refund is required.

    Ryan Canada ULC is a subsidiary of a USA company, Ryan ULC, who has broken into Canada and purchased 4-5 other Canadian tax firms in the past 10 years (AEC International, PS Johnson, ArGil Property Tax, Altus Group, etc.) It has spent over $1 billion dollars doing so (the Altus Group property tax department purchase alone was for $700 million dollars). They have been public about wanting to purchase DMA Canada as well – also a USA company with a Canadian subsidiary. They want to make good on those purchases by filing tax appeals to recoup money for their investments.

    At a time when we have strained relationships with the USA, why are we taking lobbying efforts from USA companies into consideration. How did the Canadian government even allow these purchases to go through with our anti-competition laws? The biggest players in property tax are now USA companies. So large that most cannot compete fairly now.

    With uncertainty with our trade with the USA and tariffs, uncertainty with our interest rates, an affordability crisis, etc. the last thing we should be considering is a reassessment. The office, hotel, multi-residential, and industrial sectors may not be perfectly valued but they will survive. Let’s not focus on the rich people and REITs. Those folks are going to keep getting richer, and none of the owners of those properties are going broke. The crisis is at the residential level and as stated above, there is no inherent benefit to the lower end residential homes. It will likely be objectively worse for them all.

    It’s tiring when rich (USA) companies talk about making changes to benefit other rich companies and sectors, and hide behind some sort of altruistic value of fairness, while also knowing the comparatively poor will likely not benefit. State the basis upfront and say it loud “We are a property tax company who has invested billions of dollars buying companies and we need the opportunity to appeal new values to recoup our investment. We have a large payroll right now, especially after our Altus Group purchase, and we are bleeding money. So, the only way we can continue to make millions is to lobby the government for a reassessment to help our company, and our rich client base, to get lower taxes. As for the rest of you, sorry but you are the casualties for the rich”.

    At least I’d respect the hustle more. You can’t fool me though!

     Reply




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.